No Substitute for Strategy: What’s Wrong with “Defending Forward”

No Substitute for Strategy: What’s Wrong with “Defending Forward”

The Foundation for the Defense of Democracies' latest report promises a restoration of the worst foreign policy ideas since the end of the Cold War. It should be ignored.

 

Strategy, grand or otherwise, is about choice. It is about setting priorities. President Biden has a golden opportunity to transform, not restore: to replace the blustering incompetence of the Trump years with a humbler, saner American foreign policy, one that rejects the hubris that helped put Trump in the White House. Defending Forward does promise a restoration of sorts: a restoration of the worst foreign policy ideas since the end of the Cold War. The president would do well to reject it—and its votaries.

Gil Barndollar is a senior research fellow at the Catholic University of America’s Center for the Study of Statesmanship.

 

Justin Logan (@justintlogan) is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.